ConnectiveRx Deep Dive: PE Perspective on Hub Services | Rx Almanac
This analysis is derived from two private equity investment committee memos (IC #1, October 31, 2022 and IC #2, November 7, 2022) prepared during the Kohlberg & Company acquisition of ConnectiveRx ...
Company Overview
ConnectiveRx is a leading independent provider of outsourced commercialization services to drug manufacturers, headquartered in Whippany, NJ. The company serves 120+ pharma customers across 530+ brands, with relationships with all top-20 pharma companies.
Led by CEO Jim Corrigan (former CEO of ERT, a clinical trial technology company competing with Signant Health), with COO Bob Shambaugh (also ex-ERT) and Chief Development Officer Jim Mahon (ex-ERT). The management team was brought in during 2021 to scale the business through its next growth phase, having previously run a $600M+ revenue business.
Business Model: Three Segments
ConnectiveRx operates across three reporting segments, each addressing a specific pain point in the patient access and drug commercialization journey:
1. Hub Solutions (46% of 2022E revenue, ~$182M LTM Aug-22)
What it does: Tech-enabled call center and web portal that manages the complex reimbursement process for specialty drugs. Two sub-segments:
- Hub Services: Benefits verification and prior authorization for patients picking up drugs at pharmacy (self-administered)
- Buy & Bill: Reimbursement management for physicians who purchase and administer drugs in-office (e.g., injectables)
Revenue model:
- Fixed monthly management fees (41% of segment revenue) — recurring
- Transaction fees per reimbursement step (53%) — re-occurring, tied to script volumes
- Service fees for implementation and reporting (6%) — one-time
- Cash Claims sub-segment (13% of Hub revenue): % spread on transaction value for drugs without insurance coverage in first 12-18 months post-launch
Unit economics:
- Small/mid-tier hubs (CRx sweet spot): $2-8M annual contract, 10-75 FTEs at ~$55k/head
- Mega hubs: $10-25M annual contract, 100-300+ FTEs (often require in-house pharmacy; less in CRx’s wheelhouse)
- FTE breakdown: ~60% call center, ~20% data management, ~5% program management
Growth: 20% CAGR from 2019-2022, the fastest-growing segment. Driven by specialty drug volume growth and share gains from incumbents.
Margins: ~50% gross margin. Hub contribution margin of 24% and FCF margin of 18%, lower than other segments due to heavy FTE and technology investment. Management pursuing margin improvement plan targeting ~3% gross margin expansion through automation (OCR, call bots, electronic BV) and resource pooling (cross-training FTEs across programs; 51% cross-trained, targeting 70%+).
2. Copay (27% of 2022E revenue, ~$116M LTM Aug-22)
What it does: Designs, manages, and distributes pharma-sponsored copay assistance cards that subsidize patients’ out-of-pocket costs. Integrated with pharmacy systems.
Revenue model:
- Fixed monthly management fees (25%) — recurring
- Transaction fees ~$2.50 per card redemption (69%) — re-occurring
- Cash claims (29% of segment revenue): percentage-based on dollars reimbursed
- Service fees (6%) — one-time
Growth: 3% CAGR from 2019-LTM, 5% CAGR since 2015. COVID caused a dip in 2020 due to reduced script volumes. ~96% gross retention; losses driven by LOE churn (copay not applicable to generics).
Margins: 71% gross margin, 57% contribution margin, 55% FCF margin. Highly automated with minimal FTE burden.
3. Awareness & Adherence (28% of 2022E revenue, ~$111M LTM Aug-22)
What it does: Sends clinically-relevant messages (e.g., copay assistance availability, hub enrollment links, dosing information) to prescribers and pharmacists through EHR integrations at time of prescribing or dispensing. Reaches ~70% of U.S. HCPs through its EHR network.
Revenue model:
- Transaction fees ~$2.00 per message (98%) — non-recurring, 3-month contract buy-ups
- Service fees (2%) — one-time
- Some customers use A&A as a strategic tool throughout the drug lifecycle (e.g., Januvia spent $15M/year on A&A before patent expiry)
Growth: 13% CAGR since 2019. ~100% net retention despite shorter-term contracts. Post-COVID expansion of EHR partnerships added 150k providers (~30% network increase).
Margins: 47% gross margin, 38% contribution margin, 37% FCF margin. ~50% of revenue is revenue share with EHR partners.
Consolidated Financial Performance
| Metric | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | LTM Aug-22 | CAGR (‘19-LTM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $300M | $321M | $381M | $413M | 13% |
| Revenue Growth | 8% | 7% | 19% | 15% | — |
| Gross Profit | $172M | $181M | $212M | $228M | 11% |
| Gross Margin | 58% | 56% | 56% | 55% | — |
| EBITDA | $98M | $100M | $123M | $132M | 12% |
| EBITDA Margin | 33% | 31% | 32% | 32% | — |
| Capex | $12M | $23M | $16M | $20M | — |
| FCF Conversion | 88% | 77% | 87% | 85% | — |
EBITDA walk (LTM Aug-22):
- Reported EBITDA: $121.6M
- Level A EBITDA (with slam-dunk addbacks): $131.0M
- Level B EBITDA (with executed pro forma adjustments): $131.7M
- Level C EBITDA (with post-transaction savings): $137.5M
- Buyside EBITDA: $139.4M
Capex: Growth capex primarily related to Hub platform re-platforming ($5.8M in 2022), Hub CRM ($5.2M), and Enterprise Data Warehouse ($2.9M). Growth capex expected to decline as these initiatives complete. Maintenance capex only ~$6M/year.
Market Positioning
Total Addressable Market
ConnectiveRx addresses a ~$3.0-3.5 billion served market growing 7-9% CAGR (2022-2027E), expected to reach $4.0-5.0B+ by 2027.
Market breakdown by segment (2022):
- Hub Services: ~$1.6B (growing 7-9%)
- Buy & Bill: ~$0.4B (growing 8-11%)
- Copay: ~$0.8B (growing 3-5%)
- A&A: ~$0.4B (growing 7-9%)
Market Growth Drivers
- Specialty Rx volume growth: Specialty drugs now represent >50% of drug manufacturer net revenue (up from 28% in 2010). Specialty drugs require more wrap-around services.
- Rising patient costs: Employer-sponsored deductibles have increased at 4x the pace of worker earnings, increasing need for copay assistance.
- Increasing reimbursement hurdles: PBM-induced formulary exclusions (1,156 medications excluded from Big 3 formularies in 2022, up from 109 in 2014) make access support more critical.
- Outsourcing penetration: Rates across all service lines projected to increase as payer complexity grows.
Competitive Landscape
CRx is positioned as the leading independent provider with strong capabilities across all core service offerings:
- Hub Services: Fast-growing independent platform; competing against larger players who often bundle with specialty pharmacy
- Copay: Top-3 provider
- A&A: Top-2 market position
- Win rates: CRx winning ~40-50% of all business they compete for across services
The company is favorably positioned for bundled sales — while services are typically sold separately, customers indicate increasing willingness to pursue bundled purchasing. CRx is building an Enterprise Data Warehouse to improve data visibility across solutions.
Key Competitive Advantages
- Only independent provider with strong capabilities across all three service lines
- 98% customer retention driven by high switching costs
- ~4 brands per customer with ~1-2 programs per brand (room for penetration growth)
- 68% of revenue recurring/re-occurring (monthly management fees + transaction fees tied to script volumes)
- Programs for chronic condition specialty drugs drive multi-year revenue visibility
Customer Metrics
- 120+ pharma customers across 530+ brands
- Relationships with all top-20 pharma companies
- ~98% customer retention overall
- 100%+ net retention for Hub and A&A segments; ~96% for Copay (LOE-driven churn)
Top customer concentration (2022E):
- Novo Nordisk: 13% (Ozempic 4%, Rybelsus 4%)
- Amgen: 12%
- AbbVie: 8%
- UCB: 7%
- Genentech: 5%
- Top 10 customers: ~65% of revenue
- Specialty drugs: 65-77% of revenue (77% excluding A&A segment)
Revenue mix: Hub Solutions 46%, Copay 27%, A&A 28% (shifted from Hub 37%, Copay 36%, A&A 27% at 2019 close)
Growth Strategy
Organic Growth
- Hub segment share gains: 38 brand wins in 2021, 31 in YTD Q3-2022. Sweet spot is large pharma’s small/mid-cap assets requiring 10-75 FTE hub programs.
- Hub margin improvement: COO-led initiatives targeting ~3.1% gross margin expansion through:
- Resource pooling / cross-training (targeting 85% utilization)
- Tools consolidation (single CRM for case management)
- Electronic benefit verification (eBV) replacing manual FTE processes
- OCR for automated data input ($3.4M annualized savings)
- Call monitoring and bot software ($1.3M savings)
- Bundled selling: Leveraging multi-service platform to drive enterprise-level pharma relationships
- Clinical pipeline alignment: Business mix overlaps with Phase III clinical assets in Oncology, CNS, Autoimmune, Metabolic/Endocrinology
M&A Strategy (Kohlberg Value Creation Plan)
- Priority adjacency: Specialty Pharmacy acquisition to expand Hub addressable market (many mega hubs require in-house pharmacy)
- Hub add-on acquisitions for therapeutic area expansion (oncology is primary focus)
- Leverage Kohlberg portfolio company Trinity Life Sciences for pipeline intelligence and vendor assessment
LOE Risk Management
- Brands facing LOE from 2022-2024 represent ~22% of 2022E revenue
- Probability-weighted pipeline coverage of 2.2x for 2022 LOEs and 1.1x for 2023 LOEs
- Biologics (a growing share of CRx’s mix) face less generic competition post-LOE, retaining ~50%+ revenue through 2026 per Trinity analysis
- A&A exposure is limited by shorter contract terms (3-month buy-ups)
Key Risks
- Customer concentration: Top customer (Novo Nordisk) at 13% of revenue; top 5 at ~45%
- LOE/patent cliff exposure: 22% of 2022E revenue from drugs with LOE in 2022-2024 window
- A&A contract duration: 27% of revenue tied to 3-month contract buy-ups (non-recurring)
- Cash claims duration: 14% of revenue from programs lasting 12-18 months
- Regulatory risk: Although current federal/state outlook is favorable, changes to drug pricing or copay assistance regulations could impact demand
- Hub margins: 50% gross margin with significant FTE cost base; margin improvement depends on execution of automation initiatives
- No services for generic drugs: All revenue tied to branded/specialty drug lifecycles
Precedent Transaction Multiples
The IC memo included comparable transactions for pharma services companies:
| Company | Buyer | TEV/EBITDA |
|---|---|---|
| CareMetx | General Atlantic | 25.5x |
| MMIT | Evaluate | 25.0x |
| GoodRx | Silver Lake | 23.3x |
| Trinity Life Sciences | Kohlberg | 22.3x |
| Medical Knowledge Group | Novo Holdings | 22.1x |
| InTouch Group | Eversana | 21.3x |
| Lockwood | Ares | 21.5x |
| Mean | 19.2x | |
| Median | 18.8x |
Key Takeaways for Rx Almanac
-
Hub services is a high-growth, high-margin business with strong structural tailwinds. The $3-3.5B TAM growing 7-9% is driven by specialty drug volumes and increasing payer complexity — these trends are accelerating, not decelerating.
-
The independent hub model is viable and differentiated. CRx proves that a non-pharmacy-affiliated hub provider can win and retain business at scale. The 40-50% win rate and 98% retention validate the competitive moat.
-
Hub economics are FTE-intensive but improving. The path from 50% to 55% gross margin depends on automation (eBV, OCR, call bots) and resource pooling. This is the central operational challenge for all hub providers.
-
Copay is a cash cow; A&A is an underappreciated asset. Copay at 71% gross margin and 55% FCF margin is extraordinarily profitable but low-growth. A&A with its EHR network covering 70% of U.S. HCPs is a unique distribution channel.
-
The market values bundled capabilities. CRx’s positioning as the only independent provider across all three service lines (Hub, Copay, A&A) is its core strategic advantage. Pharma buyers are increasingly willing to consolidate with providers who offer integrated data visibility.
-
Specialty pharmacy is the key missing piece for hub providers without one. It limits addressable market for mega-hub programs and is the priority M&A adjacency.
-
PE valuations of 19-25x EBITDA for pharma services companies reflect the mission-critical, recurring-revenue nature of these businesses and the strong growth outlook.
Sources
- ConnectiveRx Investment Committee #1 Memo, HP SCF / Stone Canyon, October 31, 2022
- ConnectiveRx Investment Committee #2 Memo, HP SCF / Stone Canyon, November 7, 2022
- Capstone regulatory outlook analysis (referenced in IC #2)
- Trinity Life Sciences LOE and pipeline analysis (referenced in IC #2)